The Washington Post columnist Chris Cilizza' put together a list of the top state-level political blogs. Among other blogs in Oregon, the Write Idea was included.
I am writing this post as a cordial reply to Blue Oregon’s post regarding the Washington Post’s political blog roll. This morning, Vorpal Sword had this to say about the Write Idea:
In my post regarding the Civil War entitled American Civil War: The South Was Right I present an admittedly biased, but I would like to say somewhat intellectual article on the American Civil War. Rather than engaging in a reasonable debate, the author of the above comments prefers to present an ad hominem argument that contains outright lies. I am willing to participate in an intellectual debate with anyone who reads my blog. Thus, I see no reason for the commenter to attack me personally, or for Blue Oregon to both tolerate and to host his comments.




4 comments:
Hey, for the record, we "tolerate" all kinds of comments at BlueOregon. We leave it all up, unless it's spam, violent, or vile (racist, homophobic, etc.)
Or, if it can be demonstrated to our satisfaction that it's likely slanderous or libelous.
Beyond that: I recommend arguing whatever point is in question.
Chisholm,
I think that some of those comments could be considered slanderous "I don't know what the Washington Post writer was thinking, but this Southern Neo-Confederate propaganda is the American equivalent of Holocaust Denial." Hmm... Maybe Publius is a Right-wing "Southern Neo-Confederate", he is probably part of a vast conspiracy. Also it was a direct personal attack to challenge a honest intellectual debate.
RinoWatch has even been dubbed 'irrelevant'
Thank you very much!
I think your problem is that most people who read the blog may have lost the fact that you said you believed slavery was wrong. You mentioned that early in the body of your article, but I had nearly forgotten about it by the time I got to the end. On a side note, I never fully got an impression as to what was you thought the south was right. It seemed to be a lot of general info supporting the South without a pointed, focused conclusion. You may want to consider doing a "part 2" to the article to give it fuller treatment.
Post a Comment